Comparative Analysis in Symbols: D. H. Lawrence’s Women in Love and Rumi’s Mystical Poetry

Dolat Khan; Sami ullah Khan; Mubarak Ali Lashari

Dolat Khan Faculty of English Language and Literature, University of Agriculture, Water and Marine Sciences, Uthal, Pakistan
Sami ullah Khan Faculty of English Language and Literature, University of Agriculture, Water and Marine Sciences, Uthal, Pakistan
Mubarak Ali Lashari Institute of English Language and Literature, University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan

Abstract

There is an unending critical chasm regarding the roots of Lawrence’s strange theology of ‘dark gods. His fiction such as Women in Love reveals a pretentious and dull world of extended symbols. Most prominent symbols are associated with sexual contents where characters are acutely aware of each other’s sexuality. Therefore, it is evident that many readers are unable to grasp Lawrence’s world, apparently because of his literary sensibility of rich religious symbolism. Furthermore, Lawrence’s ideas and symbols can be seen in the critical tradition of psychoanalysis and in post-modern fashion. This paper argues that symbols in Lawrence’s fiction, particularly in his Woman in Love have a religious and mystical connotation. This aspect of Lawrence’s symbolism can be appreciated profitably with some parallel analysis of Rumi’s mystical poetry. The paper has taken most prominent themes of love, ecstasy and union and their symbolic delineation in Woman in Love, analyzing them with Rumi’s handling of the aforementioned themes. Lawrence’s religious vision is clear in his use of biblical symbols in his fiction, however, his world is not based on Biblical world alone, for he calls Bible the Jewish moral book and a stick to beat an immoral dog, however, he was very much fascinated by the symbols and fantasies in the Apocalypse. He says that symbols in the Apocalypse lead us to the Chaldean and to Persian. There is a deep connection between Lawrence`s appreciation of ancient eastern myths and his use of symbolism, as this paper has argued, reveals a connection between Lawrence`s symbolism and the ancient Persian religions and medieval Sufism of Rumi and others, which has influenced Lawrence’s imaginations.

Keywords: love, mystical, symbolism

References

Arberry, A. J. (2008). Sufism: An Account of the Mystics of Islam. London: Routledge.Bauer, D. R. (1995). D. H. Lawrence’s Women in love: a symbolist novel. University of South Florida. Available from: .
Beynon, R. (1997). D. H. Lawrence: The rainbow, Women in love. Palgrave Macmillan.
Björkén, C. (1996). Into the Isle of Self: Nietzschean Patterns and Contrasts in D. H. Lawrence’s The Trespasser. Lund, Sweden: Lund University Press.
Boulton, J. T. (1999). The Selected Letters of D. H. Lawrence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burack, C. M. (2005). D. H. Lawrence’s Language of Sacred Experience: The Transfiguration of the Reader. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chambers, J. (1980). D. H. Lawrence: a personal record. CUP Archive.
Clarke, H. Wilberforce (1998). The DIVAN-I-HAFIZ. Maryland: Ibex Publishers.
Cowan, J. C. (1970). D. H. Lawrence’s American Journey: A Study in Literature and Myth. Cleveland: Press of Case Western Reserve University.
D. H., L. S. of G. B. (2006). Journal of D. H. Lawrence Studies: J. D. H. L. S. Nottingham: D H Lawrence Society.
Davis, F. H. (1908). The Persian Mystics: Jami. London: John Murray, Albemarle.
Draper, R. P. ed. (1970). D. H. Lawrence: The Critical Heritage. London: Routledge.
Fernihough, Anne (2001). The Cambridge Companion to D. H. Lawrence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fjågesund, P. (2008). D. H. Lawrence’s Women in Love: Gerald Crich and Captain Scott. English Studies: A Journal of English Language and Literature, 89 (2), p. pp. 182-194.
Greaves, Ron, et al (2009). Sufis in Western Society: Global Networking and Locality. London, Routledge.
Heaven, R. (2007). The Way of the Lover: Rumi and the Spiritual Art of Love. 1st ed. St. Paul: Minn, Llewellyn.
Herber, M. (1999). Reflections on the Death of Porcupine and other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holderness, G. (1986). Women in Love. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Hough, G. (1963). Lawrence’s Quarrel with Christianity: The Man who Died. In: D. H. Lawrence: A collection of Critical Essays. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, A Spectrum Book, p. 101.
Hough, G. (1956). The Dark Sun: A Study of D H Lawrence. Duckworth.
Hyde, V. (1992). The Risen Adam: D. H. Lawrence’s Revisionist Typology. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Kalnins, M. ed. (1995). D. H. Lawrence: Apocalypse and the writings on Revelation. London: Penguin Books.
Kinkead-Weekes, M. (2001). D. H. Lawrance: ’A passionately Religious Man., The Sewanee Review CIX (3).
Lawrence, D. H. (1937). Studies in Classic American Literature. London: Heinemann.
Lawrence, D. H. (1962). Symbolic Meaning: The Uncollected Versions of “Studies in Classic American Literature.” London: Centaur Press.
Lawrence, D. H. (1962). The Collected Letters of D. H. Lawrence. Edited with an Introduction by Harry T. Moore. London: Heinemann.
Lawrence, D. H. (1962). The Symbolic Meaning. The Uncollected Versions of “Studies in Classic American Literature”. Edited by Armin Arnold, Etc. pp. xi. 264. Centaur Press: Fontwell.
Lawrence, D. H (1985). Study of Thomas Hardy and other essays; ed. By Steele, Bruce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lawrence, D. H. (1962). Twilight in Italy. S. l., Viking.
Lawrence, D. H. (2008). Women in Love. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leavis, F. R. (1967). D H Lawrence Novelist. London: Chatto & Windus.
Meyers, J. ed. (1985). D. H. Lawrence and Tradition. London: Ath Lone Press.
Moynahan, J. L. (1956). Symbolism and Meaning in the Fiction of D H Lawrence. S. l., Harvard University.
Moyne, J. & (Maulana). J. al-D. R. (2009) Rumi and the Sufi tradition. Mazda Publishers.
Murry, J. M. (1954). D H Lawrence: Son of Woman. London: Jonathan Cape.
Muḥammad, K. & Oriental, T. F. (1906). Lawā’iḥ, a Treatise on Ṣūfism... Facsimile of an Old MS. With a Translation by E. H. Whinfield, M. A., and Mīrzā Muḥammad Ḳazvīnī, and Preface on the Influence of Greek Philosophy on Ṣūfism. London.
Nasr, S. H. (2007). The Garden of Truth: The Vision and Practice of Sufism, Islam’s Mystical Tradition. New York: HarperOne.
Ryu, D.-S. (2005). D. H. Lawrence’s The Rainbow and Women in Love: A Critical Study. New York: Peter Lang.
Sagar, K. (2008). D. H. Lawrence Poet. Penrith, Humanities - Ebooks.co.uk.
Sedgwick, M. (2009). Against the Modern World: Traditionalism and the Secret Intellectual History of the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shabistarī, M. ibn ʿAbd al-K. (1880). Gulshan I Raz: The Mystic Rose Garden of Sa’d Ud Din Mahmud Shabistari. Londo: Trübner & Co.
Spilka, Mark (1955) The Love Ethic of D. H. Lawrence, Bloomington: Indiana University press.
Stepaniants, Marietta (1989). Philosophical Aspects of Sufism. New Dehli: Ajanta Publication.
TEDLOCK, E. W. (1963). D. H. Lawrence, Artist & Rebel. A Study of Lawrence’s Fiction. pp. x. 242. University of New Mexico Press: Albuquerque.
Rūmī, M. Jalāl al-Dīn (1898). Masnavi I Ma’navi: The Spiritual Couplets of Maulána Jalálu-’d-Dín Muhammad Rúmi. 2nd ed. London, K. Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co. ltd.
Rumi, M. Jalāl, al-Din. (1979). Masnavi I Ma’navi: Teachings of Rumi: The Spiritual Couplets of Maulańa Jalálu-’D-Dín Muhammad I Rúmí. London: Octagon.
Wallace, J. (2005). D. H. Lawrence, Science and the Posthuman. Palgrave Macmillan.
Zangenehpour, F. (2000). Sufism and the Quest for Spiritual Fulfillment in D. H. Lawrence’s The Rainbow. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.

Comparative Analysis in Symbols: D. H. Lawrence’s Women in Love and Rumi’s Mystical Poetry

Abstract

References

Authors are free to: