First Information Report (FIR) as a Distinct Genre of Legalese: A Corpus-based Forensic Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33195/Abstract
Forensic linguistics deals with the use of linguistic knowledge to help solve crimes. It is an interface between language, crime, and the law. A First Information Report (FIR) is the first step in the criminal justice system to decide crimes. The language used in an FIR has wide implications in the process of administration of justice. This study was conducted to investigate how the language of FIRs is distinctive as compared to ordinary discourse, thereby constituting a genre. It further explored the characteristic linguistic features of FIRs. The data consisted of 126 FIRs (in English) registered in different police stations of Islamabad Capital Territory (ICT) during the year 2013. A small corpus of FIRs was then developed for the analysis of the language of FIRs. The methodology for the study was developed by synthesizing Genre Theory, Corpus-based strategies in linguistics research, and Forensic Linguistics. Data was analyzed at the macro level to determine the structure of FIRs. It was found that the main part of the FIR comprised the narrative in which complainants told their stories to the police officers. Linguistic features of FIRs at a micro level were analyzed with the help of methods devised in the light of previous research in discourse analysis. Distinctive linguistic features of FIRs were noted with the help of the electronic software AntConc. Findings of the analysis of the structure and the language of the FIRs point to the fact that FIRs are a separate genre in legal discourse, with distinct textual and textural features and moves. This study may be helpful to the law majors, the new entrants in the police department, and the teachers teaching English for occupational purposes.
References
Abbas, A. (2013). Semantic structure of MPhil thesis introduction section. A genre
analysis. An unpublished thesis of MPhil. Islamabad: Air University
Anthony, L. (2002). AntConc: Design and development of a freeware corpus analysis toolkit for
technical writing classroom. IEEE international conference proceedings.
Barnbook, G, Danielsson, P., & Mahlberg, M. (eds.) . (2005). Meaningful texts. London/New
York: Continuum.
Bergen, K. (2012). Louder than words: The new science how the mind makes
meaning. California, CA: Basic Books.
Bhatia, V. K. (1982). An investigation into formal and functional characteristics of
qualifications in legislative writing and its application to English for academic legal
purposes. An unpublished PhD thesis. University of Aston: Birmingham.
Bhatia, V. K. (1983). Simplification vs easification: the case of legal texts. Applied Linguistics,
(1), 42-54.
Bhatia, V. K., & Swales, J. M. (1983). An approach to the linguistic study of legal
documents. Fachsprache, 5(3), 98-108.
Bhatia, V. K. (1984). Syntactic discontinuity in legislative writing and its implications for
academic legal purposes, in A. K. Pugh and J.M. Ulijin (eds). Reading for Professional
Purposes (pp. 90-96). London: Heinemann Education Books.
Bhatia, V. K. (1992). Pragmatics of use of nominals in academic and professional genres.
Pragmatics and Language learning: Monograph Series, L. F. Bohmion and Y. Kackru,
Urbanahampaigns (eds.), 3 (1), 217-30. USA: University of Illinois.
Bhatia,V.K.(2004). Words of written discourse: A genre-based view. London and New York:
Continuum.
Blacks Law Dictionary. (1990). 6th edn, St Paul, Minn: West Publishing co.
Broeders, A.(2001). Forensic speech and audio analysis forensic linguistics. 13th Interpol
Forensic Science Symposium, Lyon, France, Netherland Forensic Institute: Ministry of
justice. Retrieved from http://www.thefls.org.uk/journal_briefhistory.hotmail.
Candlin, C. N. & Bhatia, V. K. (1998). The project report on strategies and competencies in
legal communication: A study to investigate the communicative needs of legal
professionals. Hong Kong: The Law Society of Hong Kong.
Candlin, C.N., Bhatia, V.K. and Jensen, C. (2002). Must the words collide? Professional and
academic discourse in study and practice of law, in G. Corlese and P. Riley (eds.),
Domain-Specific English: Textual Practice Across Communities and Classroom. Bem:
Verlage Peter Lang Ac, 101-14.
Conley, J. and O, Bar, M.(2005). Just words: law, language and power.2ndedn. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Coulthart, M. and Johnson, A.(2007). An introduction to forensic linguistics: Language in
evidence. London and New York: Routledge.
Coulthart, M. and Johnson ,A.(eds.). (2010).The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics.
London and New York: Routledge.
Agleson, R. D. (1988). Efficiency in legal drafting, in D. Kelly, (ed.). Essay in Legislative
Drafting: In Honour of I.Q. Ewens, CMG, CBe, QC. Adelaide: The Adelaide Law
Review Association, University of Adelaide,13-27.
Edward, L. (2006). Legal writing: Process, analysis, and organization. 4th edn. New York:
Aspen.
Filipovic, L. (2013). Constructing causation in language and memory: implications for access to
justice in multilingual interaction. The International Journal of Speech, Language and
the Law, 20, 78-93.
Flowerdrew, L. (2005). An integration of corpus-based and genre-based approaches to text
analysis in EAP/ESP: Counter criticism against corpus-based methodology. English for
Specific Purposes, 24, 321-32.
Gibbons, J. (2003). Forensic linguistics: An introduction to the language in justice system.
Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Gibbons, J. and Turella, M. (2008). Dimensions of forensic linguistics. Amesterdam/Philadelphia:
John Benjamin Publishing Company.
Gold, N. (ed.) (1982). Essay in legal education. Centre of Studies in Canadian Legal Education,
Toronto: Butterworth.
Gustafsson, M. (1975). Some syntactic properties of English law language. Turkey: University
of Turkey.
Hillier, H. (2004). Analyzing real texts. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hyland, K. (2008). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation English for
specific purposes.
Hunston, S. (2002). Corpora in applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Khan, I. (2013). Genre analysis of literature review section of MPhil dissertations. An
unpublished thesis of MPhil. Islamabad: Air University.
Kennedy, G. (2000). An introduction to corpus linguistics. London/ New York: Longman.
Kurzen, D. (2013). Foreign and archaic phrases in legal texts. The International Journal of
Speech, Language and the Law, 20, 1-19.
Martin, J. and Rose, D. (2007). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London and
New York: Continuum.
Mattila, H. (2006). Comparative legal linguistics. C. Goddard, (trans.) Aldershot: Ashgate.
McGregor, W. B. (1988). Structural analysis of police-tracker story genre in Gooniyandi.
Oceania, 58(4); 290-304. Oceania Publications: University of Sydney.
Mcmenamin, G. (2002). Forensic linguistics: Advances in forensic stylistics. Florida: CRC
Press.
Mellinkof, D. (1963). The language of the law. Boston: Little Brown and Co.
Morton, J. (2009). Genre and competence: A case study of contextualization in academic speech
genre. English for Specific Purpose, 28(4), 217-229.
Olsson, J. (2003). Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system.
Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Olsson, J. (2008). Forensic linguistics.2nd edn. London and New York: Continuum International
Publishing Group.
Olsson, J. (2012). Word crime: solving crime through forensic linguistics. New York, NY:
Continuum.
Ooi, V. Y. (2001). Investigation and teaching genres using world wide web, in M. Ghadessy,
A.Henry and R. L. Roseberry (eds.).Small Corpus Studies and ELT. Amesterdom: John
Benjamins, 175-213.
Paltridge, B. (2001). Genre and language learning classroom. Ann Arbor: University of
Michigan Press.
Paltridge, B. (2006). Discourse aanalysis. London and New York: Continuum.
Qureshi, A. M. (2011). Analyzing admission offer letters as A genre: A corpus-based study.
An unpublished, thesis of MPhil. Islamabad: International Islamic University.
Rahman. T. (2010). Language policy, identity, and eligion. Islamabad: Quaid-e-Azam
University.
Reppen, R. and Simpson, R. (2004). Corpus linguistics, in N. Schmitt (ed.), An introduction to
applied linguistics. London: Arnold, 92-111.
Robeiro, M. R. (2010). Judiciary police system of genres: A genre analysis of police reports
on language crimes against honour. An unpublished Thesis of BS. Federal University of
Santa Maria: Brazil.
Schane, S. (2006). Language and the law. London and New York: Continuum.
Shehzad, W. (2005). A corpus-based genre analysis: Computer science research article
introductions. An Unpublished thesis of PhD.Islamabad: National University of Modern
Languages.
Shuy, W. (2005). Creating language crime: How law enforcement uses (and misuses)
language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shuy, W.and Tiersma, P. (1999). Legal language. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Shuy, W. and Tiersma, P. (2005). Speaking of crime: The language of criminal justice. Chicago:
Chicago University Press.
Simpson, R. and Swales, J.M. (2001). Corpus linguistics in North America. Ann Arbor:
University of Michigan Press.
Spenser, A. (1975). Noun-verb combination in law. Birmingham: Lsu University of Aston
Stanly, R. (1984). The recognition of macrostructure: A pilot study. Reading in Foreign
Language, 2, 156-68.
Stein, G. (1999). Genres of discourse and definition of literature. Discourse Process, 28, 109-120.
Stubbs, M. (2004). Text and corpus analysis: Computer-assisted studies of language and
culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swales, J. M. (1981). Definitions in science and law: A case for subject specific ESP matters.
Fachsprache , 81, 106-112.
Swales, J. M. (1982). The case of cases in academic legal purposes. IRAL, 20, 139-48.
Swales, J. M. and Bhatia, V. (1983). An approach to the linguistic study of legal documents.
Fachsprache , 5(3), 98-108.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Swales, J.M. (2004). Research genre: Exploration and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Usmani, S.(under process). Genre nalysis of muslim family laws of Pakistan. An unpublished
thesis of MPhil. Islamabad: Air University.
William, G. (1982). Learning the law. London: Stevens and Sons.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Shaheen-ul-Zaman, Aziz Ullah Khan, Ayyaz Mahmood (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
