Meaning and Mattering: Framing Climate Change in the Documentary “A Life on our Planet” by David Attenborough

Authors

  • Afshan Abbas Lecturer, Ph. D Scholar, IIU, Islamabad Author
  • Dr. Fauzia Janjua Professor, IIU, Islamabad Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33195/ygvtd935

Keywords:

climate change, ecolinguistics, framing, documentary, trigger words

Abstract

The climate crisis is a debatable issue among academics from various disciplines. The framing strategies of presenting climate change in either beneficial or destructive way play a vital role in forming the opinion of people regarding it. The present study investigates the discursive straregies of climate change framing in the genre of  documentary  from the perspective of ecolinguistics. For the said purpose, the climate change documentary (A Life on our planet released on 2020) is chosen to   analyse the framing techniques employed by the narrator David Attenborough for the portrayal of climate change. In order to analyse frames, the mixed methods approach  is used  to identify the trigger words used as frames. The findings show that climate change is significantly portrayed in three important eco centric frames:  nuclear fatalism as an environmental catastrophe, diversity into decline and nature as a buried treasure.

Keywords: climate change, ecolinguistics, framing, documentary, trigger words

References

Arts, N. & Woerkum, C. (2006). Frame construction in interaction. In Multi- Organisational Partnerships, Alliances and Networks.

Bang, J.& Trampe, W. (2014). Aspects of an ecological theory of language. Language Sciences, 41 (part A). 83-92.

Beattie, G. , Sale, L & Mcguire, L. (2011). An inconvenient truth? Can a film really affect psychological mood and our explicit attitudes towards climate change? Semiotica.

Bormann, E. (1985). Symbolic convergence theory: A communication formulation. J. Commun., 35, 128–138.

Boykoff, M. & Roberts, J. (2007) Media coverage of climate change: current trends, strengths, weaknesses.

Christmas, S., Wright, L., Morris, L., Watson, A. & Miskelly, C. (2013). Engaging people in biodiversity issues: Final report of the biodiversity segmentation scoping study. London: Simon Christmas.

Cooper K, & Nisbet E. (2016). Green narratives: how affective responses to media messages influence risk perceptions and policy preferences about environmental hazards. Sci Commun 38(5):626–654.

Dreher, T. & Voyer, M. (2015). "Climate Refugees or Migrants? Contesting Media Frames on Climate Justice in the Pacific". Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture 9/1. 58-76.

Foust, C. & O’Shannon Murphy, W. (2009). Revealing and reframing apocalyptic tragedy in global warming discourse. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 3, 2, 151-167.

Hansen, A. (2018). Using visual images to show environmental problems. In Alwin F. Fill & Hermine Penz (eds.), The Routledge handbook of ecolinguistics, 179–195. New York: Routledge.

Howell, R. (2014). Investigating the long-term impacts of climate change communications on individuals’ attitudes and behavior. Environ Behav 46(1):70–101.

Jonnie Hughes (Producer), & Jonnie Hughes (Director). (2020). A Life on Our Planet [Documentary]. Netflix.

Kuha, M. (2018). The treatment of environmental topics in the language of politics. In Alwin F. Fill & Hermine Penz (eds.), The Routledge handbook of ecolinguistics, 249–260. New York: Routledge.

Lynteris, C. (2019). Tarbagan’s winter lair: Framing drivers of plague persistence in Inner Asia. In C. Lynteris, (Ed.) Framing Animals as Epidemic Villians (n.p). Palgrave McMillan.

Manzo. K. (2017). The usefulness of climate change films. Geoforum.

Marcot, B. & Heyden, M. (2001). Key ecological functions of wildlife species: Oregon State University Press.

Nerlich, B. & Nelya, K. (2009). Carbon reduction activism in the UK: Lexical creativity and lexical framing in the context of climate change. Environmental Communication 3(2). 206–223.

Nijland, H. , Aarts, N. & Woerkum, C. (2018). Exploring the framing of the animal farming and meat consumption: On the diversity of the topics used and qualitative patterns in selected demographic contexts. Animals, 8(2), 17.

Nolan,J. (2010) An Inconvenient Truth^ increases knowledge, concern, and willingness to reduce greenhouse gases. 42(5):643–658.

Penz, H. (2022). Global warming’ or ‘climate change’? In Alwin F. Fill & Hermine Penz (eds.), The Routledge handbook of ecolinguistics, 277–292. New York: Routledge.

Schäfer M, Schlichting.I. (2014) Media representations of climate change: a meta-analysis of the research field. Environ Commun 8(2):142–160.

Stibbe, A. (2021). Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by. Routledge.

Trampe, W. (2008). "Sign-World-Systems". In: Döring, M., Penz, H. and Trampe, W. (eds.). Language, Signs and Nature: Ecolinguistic Dimensions of Environmental Discourse. Essays in Honour of Alwin Fill. Tübingen: Stauffenburg. 39-57.

Vihersalo, M. (2008). "Framing Climate Change in Montreal 2005: An Environmental Justice Perspective". In: Carvalho, A. (ed.). Communicating climate change: Discourses, mediations and perceptions. Braga: 34- 52.

Downloads

Published

07/03/2023

How to Cite

Afshan Abbas, & Dr. Fauzia Janjua. (2023). Meaning and Mattering: Framing Climate Change in the Documentary “A Life on our Planet” by David Attenborough. University of Chitral Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 7(I), 85-89. https://doi.org/10.33195/ygvtd935