Language Hierarchy and Symbolic Power in Commercial and Institutional Signage: A Linguistic Landscape Study of Haripur City
Abstract
This study analyzes the linguistic landscape of Haripur city, a district in KPK Province, Pakistan. A total of fifty signs are photographed for this study, including signs from both institutional and commercial sectors. This study follows a qualitative approach due to its interpretive aims, supported by quantitative elements such as frequency counts. The analysis is done through the theoretical framework of linguistic landscape given by Landry and Bourhis (1997), which focuses on the informational and symbolic function of the signs, and Bourdieu’s (1991) theory of symbolic power, linguistic capital, and linguistic market. This study focuses on exploring the linguistic patterns and transliteration practices in the public signage of Haripur city and on deciphering the hidden social meanings and power relations behind the use of certain languages in public signage. The findings of the study reveal that Urdu dominates the commercial signage, English occupies the educational, medical, and institutional domains due to its association with prestige, power, and professionalism, Arabic is limited to religious signage, where it occupies a sacred symbolic capital; while Hindko and Pashto are completely absent from the public signage despite their oral dominance in domestic and informal communal domains. The findings also reveal how sign makers make use of transliteration to write English terms in Urdu Nastaliq script, combining the prestige associated with the English language with the accessibility of the Urdu script for the Urdu-literate audience. This study contributes to the growing research in the domain of linguistic landscape in the Pakistani context. The findings of this study may align with other mid-sized cities of the KPK Province.
References
Ben-Rafael, E., Shohamy, E., Amara, M. H., & Trumper-Hecht, N. (2006). Linguistic landscape as symbolic construction of the public space: The case of Israel. In D. Gorter (Ed.), Linguistic landscape: A new approach to multilingualism (pp. 7–30). Multilingual Matters.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power (G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Trans.; J. B. Thompson, Ed.). Harvard University Press.
Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2006). Linguistic landscape and minority languages. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3(1), 67–80.
Hussain, R., Iqbal, M., & Saleem, A. (2022). The linguistic landscape of Peshawar: Social hierarchies of English and its transliterations. University of Chitral Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 6(1), 223–239.
Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1997). Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), 23–49.
Pennycook, A. (2010). Language as a local practice. Routledge.
Rahman, T. (2002). Language, ideology and power: Language-learning among the Muslims of Pakistan and North India. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Haris Saleem (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.