Empowerment of Women: A Feminist Aspect of Shahraz’s “The Discovery”
Keywords:
Empowered Woman, Patriarchal Shackles, Social Construction, Reordering Institutions, Breaking TraditionsAbstract
Garner (1999) and Moghadam (1992) explicate that feminism keeps providing strategies for the empowerment of women. Their struggle against the male-dominating culture and effort to break traditional and patriarchal social shackles is a step towards the equality as well as empowerment of women. Zalewski and Runyan (2013) elucidate that feminism have boundary smashing activities along with philosophies for the empowerment of women with the help of re-ordering institutions globally for gender roles. Tyson (2006) relates this phenomenon to traditional roles regarding gender as a social construction for keeping women powerless and elevating men’s point of view. Savitt (1982) explains that all stereotype characters in literature highlight the narrowness as well as confining nature of female characters in literature, where they are mostly portrayed as incompetent, meek, dependent, helpless, troubled, and fearful creatures, while at the same time, males are presented as authoritative and powerful. Women are allotted and given subservient and passive roles to facilitate men's depriving them of their rights easily. Shahraz’s selected story breaks such tradition and presents her female protagonist as a confident, independent, educated, and empowered woman who refuses to compromise on her self-respect and decides to live alone with her future baby.
References
Ali, A., Ullah, K., Ali, S. S. (2022). The Dilemma of Women’s Identity in Pakistani TV Ads: A Case for Beauty Myth. The Dialogue, 17(4).
Auerbach, E. (1953). The Brown Stocking. In Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature (R. W. Trask, Trans., pp. 525-53). Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
Baxter, J. (2012). Positioning gender in discourse: A feminist methodology
Bhasin, K. (2006). What is patriarchy? Women unlimited: New Delhi.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Caldas-Coulthad, C., R. & Coulthard, M. (1995).Texts and practice, Reading in critical discourse analysis. Routledge publisher.
Cameron, D. (1990). The feminist critique of language: A reader. New York: Rutledge.
Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Delaney, T. (2005). Contemporary social theory. NJ: Pearson prentice-hall.
Eckrit, P. (1989). The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation. Language Variation and Change, 1, 245–267.
Ehrlich, S. (2001). Representing rape: Language and sexual consent. New York: Routledge.
Engels, F. (1993). The origin of family, private property, and state. (Trans by A. West) (Original work published 1884). Marx/Engels Internet Archive (marxists.org).
Enslin, P. and Tjiattas, M., 2004. Liberal feminism, cultural diversity and comparative education, Comparative Education, 40(4), 503-516.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Ferrant, G. (2015). How do gender inequalities hinder development? Cross-country vidence. DOI:10.15609/annaeconstat2009.117-118.313
Firestone, S. (1970). The dialectic of sex: The case for feminist revolution. William Morrow & company. U.S.
Foord, J. and Gregson, N. (1986). Patriarchy: Towards a reconceptualization. Antipode, 18(2), 186-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.1986.tb00362.x
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. London: Allen Lane.
Garner, J. D. (1999). Feminism and feminist gerontology, Journal of Women and Aging, 11(2-3), 3-12.
Gul, S., Shah, F., & Ullah, K. (2022). Pedagogy of the Oppressed: Paulo Freire’s Pedagogic Critique of Poetry-1 Syllabus at Maters Level (English) at University of Swabi, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Social Research, 4(1), 629-636.
Jalal, A., Ullah, K., & Rasool, S. H. (2023). Between Reality and Fantasy: A Psychoanalytic Study of Willy Loman in Arthur Miller's Death of the Salesman. Pakistan Journal of Society, Education and Language (PJSEL), 10(1), 291-299.
Kimmel, S. M. (2004). The Gendered Society (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Lazar, M. M. (1993). Equalizing gender relations: A case of double-talk. Discourse and Society, 4, 443–465.
Lazar, M. M. (2000). Gender, discourse and semiotics: The politics of parenthood representations. Discourse and Society, 11, 373–400.
Lazar, M. M. (2004). (Post-)Feminism in contemporary advertising: A global discourse in a local context. Paper presented at the discourse, Globalisation and gender identities conference, Cardiff, UK.
Lazar, M. M. (2007). Feminist critical discourse analysis: Articulating a feminist discourse praxis1. Critical Discourse Studies, 4(2), 141-164. doi:10.1080/17405900701464816
Macionis, J., J. (2012). Sociology. Publisher: Pearson, Boston.
Mitchell, J. (1971). Women’s estate. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Moghadam, V. M. (1992). Development and women’s emancipation: Is there a connection?, Development and change, 23(3), 215-255.
Oakley, A. (1972). Sex Gender and Society. London: Temple Smith.
Pandey, M. (2003). Feminism in contemporary British and Indian English fiction. New Delhi: Sarup & Sons.
Parveen, R. & Qadri, S., A. (2019). Gender resistance: A feminist critical discourse analysis of Qaisra Shahraz’s ‘A pair of jeans & other stories’. Journal of social sciences and humanities: Volume 27, Number 1, Spring 2019
Rasool, S. H. Ullah, K., & Jalal, A. (2023). Longing for Belonging: Home, Homemaking and Diasporas in the Selected Pakistani Fiction Writing. Pakistan Journal of Society, Education and Language (PJSEL), 9(2), 620-632.
Remlinger, K. (2005). Negociating classroom floor: Negociating ideologies of gender and sexuality. DOI:10.1057/9780230599901_5
Ritzer, G & Goodman, D., J. (2004). Sociological theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (2003). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Savitt, D. J. (1982). Female Stereotypes in Literature (With a Focus on Latin American Writers). Yale-New Haven Teachers Institute, V.
Shahraz, Q. (2013). A Pair of Jeans and & other stories. e-Book. London: Hope Road Pub. Shaheryar, Muhammad. Social Problems of Pakistan and their Solutions. http://hamariweb.com/
Slott, M. (2011). Can you be a Buddhist and a Marxist? , Contemporary Buddhism: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(2), 347-363.
Smith, D., E. (2005). Institutional-ethnography-A-Sociology-for-People. Publisher: Alta Mira Press.
Swann, J. (1988). Gender inequalities in classroom talk. English in Education, 22, 48–65.
Talbot, M. M. (1998). Language and gender: An introduction. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Tolan, F. (2006). "Feminisms" literary theory and criticism: An Oxford guide. (P. Waugh, Ed.) New York: Oxford University Press.
Tyson, L. (2006). Critical Theory Today: A User-Friendly Guide (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Ullah, K. (2020), The Main Culprit for the Relationship between Husband and Wife in Lady Chatterley’s Lover. University of Chitral Journal of Linguistics and Literature
Ullah, K., Khan, A. (2020). Indian Immigrants in Lahiri’s The Namesake: Diasporic Identity Process. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(08).
Walby, S. (1990). Theorizing Patriarchy. Blackwell Publishers Ltd.: Oxford, UK and Cambridge, USA.
Walsh, C. (2001). Gender and discourse: Language and power in politics, the church, and organizations. London: Pearson Education.
Weedon, C. (1997). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
West, C. (1990). Not just doctors’ orders: Directive–response sequences in patients’ visits to women and men physicians. Discourse and Society, 1, 85–112.
Wodak, R. (2005). Gender mainstreaming and the European Union: Interdisciplinarity, gender studies and CDA. In M. M. Lazar (Ed.), Feminist critical discourse analysis: Gender, power and ideology in discourse (pp. 90–113). London: Palgrave.
Wollstonecraft, M. (1792). A vindication of the rights of woman: with strictures on political and moral subjects.
Zalewski, M. and Runyan, A. S. (2013). Taking feminist violence seriously in feminist international relations. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 15(3), 293-313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2013.766102
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sabahat Rafique (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
